Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X
79 Imaging
59 Features
76 Overall
65
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1X, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-T1 IR was launched 4 years before the E-M1X which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR grades vs the E-M1X in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T1 IR & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T1 IR Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR
E-M1X | Fujifilm X-T1 IR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | August 2015 | More modern by 42 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR offers outside measurements of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") having a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1X has dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1X in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs the E-M1X.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M1X is 79 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M1X.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T1 IR is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T1 IR | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-08-03 | 2019-01-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | Optional | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 440g (0.97 lbs) | 997g (2.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 870 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) | - |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $2,999 |