Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III
79 Imaging
58 Features
76 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20f3d/20f3d636276a558a1cadf08cf1dc6b903814bdb2" alt="Fujifilm X-T1 front Fujifilm X-T1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-T2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 (16MP) and the E-M10 III (16MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-T1 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) provide different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-T1 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the E-M10 III which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T1 scores versus the E-M10 III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T1 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T1 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-T1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-T1
E-M10 III | Fujifilm X-T1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | ![]() | April 2014 | Newer by 41 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 and Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-T1 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T1 has got external measurements of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") and a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 vs the E-M10 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1391/c139196adeada48c270062832d5dee2d7f106d59" alt="Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T1 and E-M10 III is 79 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30a50/30a509b610370b077b1b630c948997fdc93af89a" alt="Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T1 and E-M10 III.
As you have seen, both cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T1 uses the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged Fujifilm X-T1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3b97/e3b971724fede2b9e7619fa1b91a940b8a6f98c5" alt="Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d8c0/0d8c0191cb978c273d2aa8a6178376cbdb6f10d7" alt="Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-T1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-04-14 | 2017-08-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD (RGBW) | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m (ISO100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Activated when external flash is connected Red-eye removal OFF: Auto / Forced Flash / Slow Synchro / Suppressed Flash / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander Red-eye removal ON: Red-eye Reduction Auto / Red-eye Reduction & Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Red-eye Reduction & Slow Synchro / Red-e | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 440 gr (0.97 lbs) | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 330 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,300 | $650 |