Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II
Portability
76 Imaging
67 Features
79 Overall
71
76 Imaging
67 Features
79 Overall
71
Portability
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
Fujifilm X-T2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 507g - 133 x 92 x 49mm
- Announced July 2016
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T1
- Updated by Fujifilm X-T3
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm X-T2 versus Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T2 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm X-T2 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X-T2 was announced 2 months before the E-M1 II which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm X-T2 scores vs the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T2 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T2 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T2 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-T2 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-T2
| E-M1 II | Fujifilm X-T2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T2 and Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-T2 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2016 |  | September 2016 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T2 provides outer dimensions of 133mm x 92mm x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T2 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T2 against the E-M1 II.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T2 and E-M1 II is 76 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T2 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T2 will render more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
you can focus manually
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW files
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2 Street photography information
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
no image stabilization
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm X-T2
Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect AF
no image stabilization
not so great battery power (340 CIPA)
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2 Travel photography features
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
weather proofing
MP count good (24MP)
not so great battery power (340 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment sealing
boasts focus by touch
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
good sized screen (3.2 inches)
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
exports RAW files
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
no image stabilization
not so great battery power (340 CIPA)
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T2 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does have microphone jack
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic jack
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-07-07 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | X-Processor Pro2 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 325 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 14.0fps | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 507 gr (1.12 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 92 x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS II | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
| Cost at launch | $1,600 | $1,700 |