Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X
76 Imaging
67 Features
79 Overall
71
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 507g - 133 x 92 x 49mm
- Introduced July 2016
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T1
- Successor is Fujifilm X-T3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm X-T2 and Olympus E-M1X, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T2 (24MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm X-T2 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X-T2 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the E-M1X and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T2 grades versus the E-M1X with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T2 over the Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T2 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Clearer display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-T2
| E-M1X | Fujifilm X-T2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2019 |  | July 2016 | More recent by 31 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T2 and Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T2 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T2 has got exterior dimensions of 133mm x 92mm x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has sizing of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T2 and Olympus E-M1X in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T2 versus the E-M1X.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T2 and E-M1X is 76 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T2 and E-M1X.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T2 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T2 will give you greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-T2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Fujifilm X-T2 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-07-07 | 2019-01-24 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | X-Processor Pro2 | Dual TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 325 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 507 grams (1.12 lb) | 997 grams (2.20 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 92 x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | 870 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS II | - |
| Card slots | Dual | Dual |
| Cost at launch | $1,600 | $2,999 |
