Clicky

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
76
Imaging
67
Features
79
Overall
71
Fujifilm X-T2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T2
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 507g - 133 x 92 x 49mm
  • Released July 2016
  • Old Model is Fujifilm X-T1
  • Later Model is Fujifilm X-T3
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Sigma. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T2 (24MP) and the Quattro (29MP) is relatively similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm X-T2 was introduced 5 months later than the Quattro so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm X-T2 grades versus the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T2 over the Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm X-T2 Quattro 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3.2"3"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm X-T2

 Quattro Fujifilm X-T2 
Screen resolution1620k1040kSharper screen (+580k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T2 and Sigma Quattro

 Fujifilm X-T2 Quattro 
ReleasedJuly 2016February 2016Similar age
Manual focus More exact focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T2 comes with outside dimensions of 133mm x 92mm x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

See the Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T2 vs the Quattro.

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T2 and Quattro is 76 and 63 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T2 and Quattro.

To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sigma Quattro to offer you greater detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively.

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-T2
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
80
focusing manually
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
81
manual focus
excellent resolution (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-T2 Street photography factors
Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
75
tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
59
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X-T2
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
72
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
bad battery power (340 per charge)
70
excellent resolution (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T2 Travel photography information
Sigma Quattro Travel photography information
63
environment sealing
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
bad battery power (340 CIPA)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
55
weather sealing
excellent resolution (29 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (625 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
75
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
good sized screen (3.2")
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have low pass filter
exports RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
does not have image stabilization
bad battery power (340 CIPA)
72
manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3")
excellent resolution (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm X-T2
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
33
offers face detection autofocus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone socket
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
22
includes face detection autofocus
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low ( resolution)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-T2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T2 and Sigma Quattro
 Fujifilm X-T2Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Company FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm X-T2 Sigma sd Quattro
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2016-07-07 2016-02-23
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip X-Processor Pro2 Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS III CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 368.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 29MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 325 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X Sigma SA
Amount of lenses 54 76
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.2 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dots 1,620 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 14.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) -
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 -
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 507g (1.12 lbs) 625g (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 133 x 92 x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 340 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-W126S BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS II SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 1
Price at launch $1,600 $738