Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76


65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Introduced February 2022

Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was announced 3 years earlier than the OM System OM-1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the OM System OM-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 & OM System OM-1. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the OM System OM-1
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1620k | Crisper display (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
OM System OM-1 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2022 | ![]() | January 2020 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T200 features exterior measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the OM System OM-1 has measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") having a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the OM System OM-1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1 is 80 and 65 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 1053 |
Cross focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 118 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3.00 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,780 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 599 grams (1.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | 520 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Price at release | $699 | $2,199 |