Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
![OM System OM-1 front OM System OM-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/OM-System-OM-1/OM-System-OM-1-front.jpg)
65 Imaging
64 Features
96 Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Introduced February 2022
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the OM System OM-1 (20MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and OM System OM-1 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T200 was announced 3 years earlier than the OM System OM-1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the OM System OM-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 & OM System OM-1. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & OM System OM-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the OM System OM-1
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1620k | Crisper display (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
OM System OM-1 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2022 | ![]() | January 2020 | More modern by 25 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T200 features exterior measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the OM System OM-1 has measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") having a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the OM System OM-1.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-OM-System-OM-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1 is 80 and 65 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-OM-System-OM-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and OM System OM-1.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-T200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-OM-System-OM-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-OM-System-OM-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs OM System OM-1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | OM System OM-1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2022-02-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 1053 |
Cross focus points | - | 1053 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 118 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3.00 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,780 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 599 grams (1.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | 520 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLX-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Card slots | One | Two |
Price at release | $699 | $2,199 |