Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
80
Imaging
69
Features
87
Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Revealed January 2020
  • Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Fujifilm X-T200 was revealed 3 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up versus the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 II 
RevealedJanuary 2020September 2016More modern by 41 months
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution2780k1037kClearer display (+1743k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-T200

 E-M1 II Fujifilm X-T200 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 II 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 provides exterior measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the E-M1 II.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 II is 80 and 68 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 II.

As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-T200 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
81
focusing manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
75
has manual focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
77
screen articulates
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
no image stabilization
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch focus
environment proofing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
70
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
comes with phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect AF
terrible battery (350 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
79
supports bluetooth
provides focus by touch
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (270 per charge)
72
lighter than competition (574g)
environment proofing
provides touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery (350 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
73
focusing manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
big screen (3.5")
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no image stabilization
not so great battery pack (270 CIPA)
76
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
has dual storage slots
terrible battery (350 shots)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
features face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does have mic support
no image stabilization
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition (574 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2020-01-22 2016-09-19
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 6000 x 4000 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 12800 25600
Highest boosted ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 425 121
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 3.5" 3"
Screen resolution 2,780 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (at ISO 200) 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 4096x2160
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MOV, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 370 gr (0.82 pounds) 574 gr (1.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 1312
Other
Battery life 270 photographs 350 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126S BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots 1 Dual
Pricing at launch $699 $1,700