Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II
80 Imaging
68 Features
87 Overall
75
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-T200 was revealed 3 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up versus the E-M1 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 |  | September 2016 | More modern by 41 months |
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 2780k |  | 1037k | Clearer display (+1743k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M1 II | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 provides exterior measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the E-M1 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 II is 80 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 II.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-T200 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 2,780 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 60.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
| Pricing at launch | $699 | $1,700 |