Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
80
Imaging
69
Features
87
Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Released January 2020
  • Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm X-T200 was unveiled at a similar time to the E-M1 III so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores versus the E-M1 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 III 
Screen sizing3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2780k1037kSharper screen (+1743k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Fujifilm X-T200

 E-M1 III Fujifilm X-T200 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 III

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M1 III 
RevealedJanuary 2020February 2020Similar age
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated screen
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 features outer dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 and the E-M1 III.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 III is 80 and 67 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1 III.

As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Portrait photography camera
81
you can focus manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
77
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
77
fully articulated screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch focus
no image stabilization
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch focus
environment proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography factors
70
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
has phase detect AF
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (270 CIPA)
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
high fps (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography features
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography features
79
has bluetooth
includes touch focus
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
not so great battery life (270 shots)
79
environment proofing
supports bluetooth
provides touch focus
good MP (20MP)
selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography info
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
big screen (3.5")
MP count decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
not so great battery life (270 shots)
81
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
has dual storage slots
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging details
Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging details
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
includes face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has mic support
no image stabilization
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1 III
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2020-01-22 2020-02-11
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic IX
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 12800 25600
Max enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 425 121
Cross type focus points - 121
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Display size 3.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 2,780 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per second 60.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (at ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash modes - Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 4096x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 370 grams (0.82 lb) 580 grams (1.28 lb)
Dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 270 pictures 420 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126S BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Storage slots Single Two
Retail cost $699 $1,800