Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d25e/1d25e91770cb3ce193205d6fab7e3c5065a5de81" alt="Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 II, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) come with different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-T200 was manufactured 4 years after the E-M10 II which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the E-M10 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | ![]() | August 2015 | More modern by 54 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1740k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-M10 II | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 features outside dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4370e/4370e887e178d58b5fa05515cab7e2e2888dc929" alt="Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 II is 80 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c601/8c6015827e681960e2527803fe3ac9076d7ccedc" alt="Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 II.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will show extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T200 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac81/8ac8179f8af3cb1a12cfe9dfc0361784f7f2345a" alt="Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c2c0/1c2c0433afd96f1b3b2737fd1ddeaaf5dcdb337c" alt="Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-01-22 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 320 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $699 | $499 |