Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-T200 was revealed 6 months earlier than the E-M10 IV and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores against the E-M10 IV in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2780k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1740k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M10 IV | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 | August 2020 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T200 offers outer measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 IV has measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 IV.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 IV is 80 and 81 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 IV.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-01-22 | 2020-08-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 8.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | - | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lbs) | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 360 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $699 | $699 |