Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) boast different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-T200 was revealed 6 months earlier than the E-M10 IV and they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores against the E-M10 IV in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2780k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1740k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M10 IV | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 | August 2020 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T200 offers outer measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 IV has measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 IV.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 IV is 80 and 81 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 IV.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-01-22 | 2020-08-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 8.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | - | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lbs) | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 360 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $699 | $699 |