Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-T200 was released 2 years later than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores vs the E-M10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 | August 2017 | Fresher by 30 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2780k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1740k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M10 III | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 III
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III is 80 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2017-08-31 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 2,780k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 8.6fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lb) | 410 grams (0.90 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 330 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $650 |