Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-T200 was released 2 years later than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores vs the E-M10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 | August 2017 | Fresher by 30 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2780k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1740k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M10 III | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 III
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 III.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III is 80 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2017-08-31 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 2,780k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 8.6fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370 grams (0.82 lb) | 410 grams (0.90 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 330 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $650 |