Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
80
Imaging
70
Features
87
Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Launched January 2020
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Fujifilm X-T200 was released 2 years later than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores vs the E-M10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M10 III 
RevealedJanuary 2020August 2017Fresher by 30 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution2780k1040kSharper screen (+1740k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-T200

 E-M10 III Fujifilm X-T200 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-M10 III 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M10 III.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III is 80 and 80 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M10 III.

Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 will have an edge in sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
82
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
73
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
78
fully articulated screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
supports touch to focus
lack of image stabilization
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
includes focus via touch
great high ISO (25,600)
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography details
70
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
low battery power (270 shots)
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography advice
79
connects via bluetooth
supports touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
low battery power (270 per charge)
67
includes focus via touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Landscape photography info
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography info
73
you can focus manually
change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen larger than average (3.5")
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
low battery power (270 per charge)
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging info
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
has face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic socket
lack of image stabilization
32
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no external mic support
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M10 III
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2020-01-22 2017-08-31
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 12800 25600
Max boosted ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 425 121
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen size 3.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 2,780k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.62x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (at ISO 200) 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes - Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 370 grams (0.82 lb) 410 grams (0.90 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 270 images 330 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126S BLS-50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $699 $650