Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1X, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) feature different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-T200 was announced 13 months after the E-M1X which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up vs the E-M1X when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2020 |  | January 2019 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 2780k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1743k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-M1X | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got outer dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has sizing of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-M1X in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the E-M1X.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1X is 80 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-M1X.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-T200 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2019-01-24 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,780k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lb) | 997 gr (2.20 lb) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 pictures | 870 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
| Storage slots | Single | 2 |
| Pricing at release | $699 | $2,999 |