Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Newer Model is Olympus E-P2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-T200 was released 10 years later than the E-P1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the E-P1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-P1
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2020 | July 2009 | Fresher by 128 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 2780k | 230k | Sharper display (+2550k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-P1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 features external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-P1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P1 is 80 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P1.
All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2009-07-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 2,780k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $699 | $182 |