Clicky

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1

Portability
80
Imaging
70
Features
87
Overall
76
Fujifilm X-T200 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
  • Revealed January 2020
  • Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
Olympus E-P1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-P2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-P1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-P1 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor size.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Fujifilm X-T200 was released 10 years later than the E-P1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the E-P1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-P1

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-P1 
LaunchedJanuary 2020July 2009Fresher by 128 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution2780k230kSharper display (+2550k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Fujifilm X-T200

 E-P1 Fujifilm X-T200 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1

 Fujifilm X-T200 E-P1 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 features external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-P1.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P1 is 80 and 86 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P1.

All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-P1 Portrait photography information
82
has manual focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T200
Street photography with Olympus E-P1
78
screen articulates fully
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
includes focus via touch
does not have image stabilization
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-P1 Sports photography highlights
70
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
decent MP (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
has phase detect autofocus
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery life (270 shots)
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (300 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-P1 Travel photography advice
79
has bluetooth
includes focus via touch
decent MP (24 megapixels)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
not so great battery life (270 per charge)
43
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (300 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-P1 as a Landscape photography camera
73
has manual focus
change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inches)
decent MP (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery life (270 CIPA)
60
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (300 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-P1 Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has external mic port
does not have image stabilization
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focus
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P1
 Fujifilm X-T200Olympus PEN E-P1
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T200 Olympus PEN E-P1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2020-01-22 2009-07-29
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 12800 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 425 11
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 2,780k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 60 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (at ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 370g (0.82 lb) 355g (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 536
Other
Battery life 270 photographs 300 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126S BLS-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC card
Card slots One One
Cost at release $699 $182