Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-P1
- Updated by Olympus E-P3
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-P2 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-P2 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-T200 was announced 9 years after the E-P2 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the E-P2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus PEN E-P2. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-P2
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 |  | April 2010 | Newer by 119 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 2780k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+2550k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-P2 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P2
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 has outer dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 against the E-P2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P2 is 80 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P2.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-T200 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2010-04-22 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 370 gr (0.82 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 505 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126S | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $699 | $799 |
