Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Announced January 2020
- Superseded the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-PL1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-T200 was released 9 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores against the E-PL1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-PL1
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2020 | May 2010 | Newer by 118 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 2780k | 230k | Clearer display (+2550k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
| E-PL1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-PL1
| Fujifilm X-T200 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1 has dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Olympus E-PL1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 against the E-PL1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-PL1 is 80 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-PL1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2020-01-22 | 2010-05-17 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Truepic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 2,780 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 334g (0.74 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 54 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 487 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 290 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $699 | $288 |