Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Announced January 2020
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Launched April 2019
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and G95 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-T200 was introduced 10 months after the G95 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the G95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-T200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Panasonic G95
Fujifilm X-T200 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2020 | April 2019 | Newer by 10 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 2780k | 1240k | Clearer display (+1540k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Fujifilm X-T200
G95 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Panasonic G95
Fujifilm X-T200 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got physical measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Panasonic G95 has proportions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs the G95.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-T200 and G95 is 80 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and G95.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T200 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will render more detail using its extra 3.7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-01-22 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,780k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 536g (1.18 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 shots | 290 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $699 | $998 |