Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76


81 Imaging
49 Features
57 Overall
52
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Revealed January 2020
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 124 x 90 x 45mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Updated by Panasonic GH2

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and GH1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and GH1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X-T200 was brought out 10 years later than the GH1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades against the GH1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T200 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Panasonic GH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Panasonic GH1
Fujifilm X-T200 | GH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2020 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 129 months |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+2320k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH1 over the Fujifilm X-T200
GH1 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Panasonic GH1
Fujifilm X-T200 | GH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 offers physical measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") and a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH1 has proportions of 124mm x 90mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the GH1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and GH1 is 80 and 81 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T200 and GH1.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will show extra detail having its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T200 vs Panasonic GH1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-01-22 | 2009-07-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 18.89 x 14.48mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 273.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,780k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 10.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 pounds) | 385g (0.85 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 124 x 90 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $699 | $949 |