Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Older Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Released February 2012
- Old Model is Samsung NX100
- Refreshed by Samsung NX210
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung NX200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-T200 was introduced 8 years after the NX200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm X-T200 scores against the NX200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung NX200. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Samsung NX200
Fujifilm X-T200 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | February 2012 | More modern by 97 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 2780k | 614k | Crisper screen (+2166k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Fujifilm X-T200
NX200 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung NX200
Fujifilm X-T200 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 comes with exterior dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T200 and Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the NX200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and NX200 is 80 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and NX200.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Fujifilm X-T200 to produce extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-01-22 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 54 | 32 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,780k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lbs) | 223g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 330 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $699 | $818 |