Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
![Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Alpha-a3500/Sony-a3500-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Launched January 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Released March 2014
- Succeeded the Sony A3000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Sony. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T200 was brought out 5 years after the a3500 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up against the a3500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony Alpha a3500. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Sony a3500
Fujifilm X-T200 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2020 | ![]() | March 2014 | More modern by 72 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+2550k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Fujifilm X-T200
a3500 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony a3500
Fujifilm X-T200 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got external dimensions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Sony a3500 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 against the a3500.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-a3500-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T200 and a3500 is 80 and 69 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-a3500-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T200 and a3500.
As you can see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Fujifilm X-T200 to produce greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-T200 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-a3500-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T200-vs-Sony-Alpha-a3500-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-01-22 | 2014-03-21 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 54 | 121 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,780k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash options | - | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370 grams (0.82 pounds) | 411 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | 470 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $398 |