Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II
80 Imaging
69 Features
87 Overall
76
88 Imaging
56 Features
82 Overall
66
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Released January 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 18-50mm (F1.8-4.0) lens
- 292g - 106 x 60 x 47mm
- Released May 2023
- Replaced the Sony ZV-1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Sony ZV-1 II, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and the ZV-1 II (20MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and ZV-1 II (1") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-T200 was manufactured 4 years before the ZV-1 II and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony ZV-1 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm X-T200 matches up vs the ZV-1 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony ZV-1 Mark II. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery and Sony ZV-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Sony ZV-1 II
| Fujifilm X-T200 | ZV-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2780k | 922k | Sharper screen (+1858k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-1 II over the Fujifilm X-T200
| ZV-1 II | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2023 | January 2020 | Fresher by 40 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Sony ZV-1 II
| Fujifilm X-T200 | ZV-1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T200 features external measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) while the Sony ZV-1 II has proportions of 106mm x 60mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.9") along with a weight of 292 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T200 versus Sony ZV-1 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 compared to the ZV-1 II.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and ZV-1 II is 80 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and ZV-1 II.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T200 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-T200 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Sony ZV-1 II Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony ZV-1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T200 | Sony ZV-1 Mark II |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2020-01-22 | 2023-05-27 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 18-50mm (2.8x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-4.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 54 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 2,780k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/100 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lb) | 292 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 106 x 60 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | 260 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126S | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $699 | $899 |