Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
71 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 539g - 133 x 93 x 59mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T2
- Successor is Fujifilm X-T4
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T3 (26MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-T3 (APS-C) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm X-T3 was launched 9 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-T3 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-T3 scores versus the GR Digital III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T3 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T3 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T3 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X-T3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 111 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Fujifilm X-T3
GR Digital III | Fujifilm X-T3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T3 and Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X-T3 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T3 has outer measurements of 133mm x 93mm x 59mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3") and a weight of 539 grams (1.19 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T3 versus the GR Digital III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T3 and GR Digital III is 71 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T3 and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T3 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-T3 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 16MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T3 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T3 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Fujifilm X-T3 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X-T3 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2018-09-06 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor 4 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 54 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p/23.98p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 539 gr (1.19 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 93 x 59mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,500 | $399 |