Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
Portability
67 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
67 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Portability
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
Fujifilm X-T4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 607g - 135 x 93 x 64mm
- Launched February 2020
- Old Model is Fujifilm X-T3
- Updated by Fujifilm X-T5
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T4 (26MP) and E-M10 IV (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-T4 (APS-C) and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm X-T4 was launched 5 months before the E-M10 IV which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm X-T4 matches up versus the E-M10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T4 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-T4 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T4 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1040k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Fujifilm X-T4
| E-M10 IV | Fujifilm X-T4 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T4 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | August 2020 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-T4 has got exterior dimensions of 135mm x 93mm x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 607 grams (1.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 IV has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-T4 vs the E-M10 IV.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M10 IV is 67 and 81 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M10 IV.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T4 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-T4 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Portrait photography details
Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography details
manual focus
megapixel count fantastic (26 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Street photography camera
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
features touch focus
weather sealing
heavier than competition (607 grams)
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm X-T4
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count fantastic (26MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
good battery life (500 per charge)
supports phase detect AF
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
no phase detect AF
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
good battery life (500 per charge)
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
features touch focus
megapixel count fantastic (26 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition (607g)
supports bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count fantastic (26 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
good battery life (500 shots)
2 card slots
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging factors
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic support
heavier than competition (607g)
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
no mic port
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-02-24 | 2020-08-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 4 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 15.0fps | 8.7fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 607g (1.34 pounds) | 383g (0.84 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 135 x 93 x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 360 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Launch price | $1,700 | $699 |
