Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X
Portability
67 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
67 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Portability
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
54 Imaging
62 Features
93 Overall
74
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
Fujifilm X-T4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 607g - 135 x 93 x 64mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T3
- Renewed by Fujifilm X-T5
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Launched January 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Fujifilm X-T4 versus Olympus E-M1X, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T4 (26MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-T4 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X-T4 was revealed 14 months later than the E-M1X which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm X-T4 matches up against the E-M1X with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T4 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T4 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T4 over the Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | January 2019 | More recent by 14 months |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-T4
| E-M1X | Fujifilm X-T4 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T4 and Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Both are selfie friendly | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T4 provides outside dimensions of 135mm x 93mm x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 607 grams (1.34 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-T4 versus Olympus E-M1X in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-T4 and the E-M1X.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M1X is 67 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M1X.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T4 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-T4 will produce more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T4 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-T4
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1X
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is fantastic (26MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection focus
exports RAW formats
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M1X Street photography highlights
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
environment sealing
heavier than competition in class (607g)
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
environment sealing
great high ISO (25,600)
heavier than others in class (997 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Sports photography features
Olympus E-M1X Sports photography features
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is fantastic (26MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery power (500 per charge)
has phase detect auto focus
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery (870 per charge)
has phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-M1X as a Travel photography camera
great battery power (500 CIPA)
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
includes focus by touch
sensor resolution is fantastic (26MP)
display is selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (607 grams)
better than average battery (870 per charge)
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
has touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
heavier than others in class (997g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography advice
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is fantastic (26 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
great battery power (500 shots)
two card slots
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery (870 per charge)
2 card slots
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T4 Vlogging details
Olympus E-M1X Vlogging details
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
has external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (607g)
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has external mic support
heavier than others in class (997 grams)
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2020-02-24 | 2019-01-24 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 4 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 15.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 607 grams (1.34 pounds) | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 93 x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | 870 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots (UHS-II supported) | - |
| Card slots | 2 | 2 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $2,999 |
