Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II
67 Imaging
70 Features
92 Overall
78
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 607g - 135 x 93 x 64mm
- Released February 2020
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-T3
- Successor is Fujifilm X-T5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Fujifilm X-T4 versus Olympus E-M5 II, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T4 (26MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T4 (APS-C) and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X-T4 was manufactured 5 years after the E-M5 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm X-T4 grades vs the E-M5 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-T4 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T4 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T4 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 | February 2015 | More modern by 62 months | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Clearer display (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Fujifilm X-T4
| E-M5 II | Fujifilm X-T4 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T4 and Olympus E-M5 II
| Fujifilm X-T4 | E-M5 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T4 features external dimensions of 135mm x 93mm x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 607 grams (1.34 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 II has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-T4 versus Olympus E-M5 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-T4 against the E-M5 II.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M5 II is 67 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-T4 and E-M5 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T4 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T4 will render more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T4 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm X-T4 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
| Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-T4 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2020-02-24 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | X-Trans CMOS 4 | MOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 15.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 607 grams (1.34 pounds) | 469 grams (1.03 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 135 x 93 x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 896 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | 310 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 2 | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $699 |