Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
83 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 350g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched July 2012
- Replacement is Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm X10 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm X10 (2/3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X10 was launched 10 months after the GR Digital IV and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X10 scores versus the GR Digital IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X10 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm X10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | September 2011 | More modern by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm X10
GR Digital IV | Fujifilm X10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
Fujifilm X10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm X10 has outer measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X10 against the GR Digital IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X10 and GR Digital IV is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X10 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X10 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X10 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X10 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-07-11 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/1000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (70, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (120 fps), 320 x 112 (200 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 350 grams (0.77 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 50 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 245 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photographs | 390 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $600 | $599 |