Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
83 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
![Fujifilm X10 front Fujifilm X10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X10/Fujifilm-X10-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS/Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 350g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Announced July 2012
- Successor is Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X10 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the Fujifilm X10 (2/3") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X10 was brought out 19 months earlier than the WG-4 GPS which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X10 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm X10 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Fujifilm X10
WG-4 GPS | Fujifilm X10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2012 | More modern by 19 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Fujifilm X10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X10 comes with outer dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X10 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X10 against the WG-4 GPS.
![Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X10-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X10 and WG-4 GPS is 83 and 90 respectively.
![Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X10-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X10 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X10-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X10-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-GPS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-07-11 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/1000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (70, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (120 fps), 320 x 112 (200 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 350 grams (0.77 lbs) | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 50 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 245 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $600 | $210 |