Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
83 Imaging
38 Features
57 Overall
45
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 350g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Announced July 2012
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm X10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm X10 (2/3") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe Fujifilm X10 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm X10 grades against the WG-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
Fujifilm X10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 2.8" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm X10
WG-M1 | Fujifilm X10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | July 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X10 and Ricoh WG-M1
Fujifilm X10 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X10 features physical measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has sizing of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X10 versus the WG-M1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X10 and WG-M1 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X10 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X10 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-07-11 | 2014-09-12 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.8 inch | 1.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 115k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/1000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (70, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (120 fps), 320 x 112 (200 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 350 gr (0.77 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 50 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 245 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photographs | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $600 | $2,000 |