Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III
79 Imaging
67 Features
69 Overall
67


92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 469g - 127 x 75 x 52mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X100T
- Renewed by Fujifilm X100V
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR Digital III, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X100F (24MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the Fujifilm X100F (APS-C) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm X100F was introduced 7 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X100F being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm X100F matches up vs the GR Digital III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X100F Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100F over the Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X100F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2017 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 92 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Fujifilm X100F
GR Digital III | Fujifilm X100F |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR Digital III
Fujifilm X100F | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X100F offers external measurements of 127mm x 75mm x 52mm (5.0" x 3.0" x 2.0") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR Digital III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X100F against the GR Digital III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100F and GR Digital III is 79 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The image underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100F and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X100F having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X100F will give you more detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X100F is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Fujifilm X100F | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X100F | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2017-01-18 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor Pro | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.60 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 208g (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 127 x 75 x 52mm (5.0" x 3.0" x 2.0") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,300 | $399 |