Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR
80 Imaging
57 Features
50 Overall
54
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8327e/8327e4033b64b6085a161e6fd1c7292266ecb82c" alt="Fujifilm X100S front Fujifilm X100S front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13ebc/13ebc3c2793d203ea2398f0aa96e683a4f696bfe" alt="Ricoh GR front Ricoh GR front"
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 445g - 127 x 74 x 54mm
- Revealed July 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X100
- New Model is Fujifilm X100T
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Later Model is Ricoh GR II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X100S (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Fujifilm X100S was announced 4 months later than the GR which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm X100S matches up versus the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100S Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100S over the Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X100S | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Fujifilm X100S
GR | Fujifilm X100S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X100S | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2013 | ![]() | April 2013 | Similar generation |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100S comes with exterior measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X100S versus the GR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b3f3/5b3f31cbcaa89ee88be055bb3f915df0f8bcdd1b" alt="Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR size comparison Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100S and GR is 80 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2002/d2002d926a641999961f836246cb218be1324b3e" alt="Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100S and GR.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files but you should take the release date of the products into consideration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cffba/cffbaf085667b3d0a481ab8a6c7e0dc16606dbe5" alt="Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c8af/1c8afc26d303250cabd25ecd3ea474a928bc155d" alt="Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Fujifilm X100S | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | Fujifilm X100S | Ricoh GR |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-07-29 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,350 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 300 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.00 m | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 gr (0.98 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 127 x 74 x 54mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 290 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-95 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,299 | $971 |