Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240
80 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60


74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expand to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 440g - 127 x 74 x 52mm
- Revealed September 2014
- Older Model is Fujifilm X100S
- Later Model is Fujifilm X100F
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X100T (16MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X100T (APS-C) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) boast different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X100T was brought out 2 years later than the M Typ 240 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X100T being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm X100T matches up vs the M Typ 240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X100T & Leica M Typ 240. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X100T Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X100T over the Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X100T | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm X100T
M Typ 240 | Fujifilm X100T |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X100T and Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X100T | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X100T offers outer measurements of 127mm x 74mm x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") and a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Leica M Typ 240 has dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X100T and the M Typ 240.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X100T and M Typ 240 is 80 and 74 respectively.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X100T and M Typ 240.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X100T due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X100T provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X100T vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Fujifilm X100T | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm X100T | Leica M Typ 240 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-09-12 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 5952 x 3976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 92 percent | 1 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.00 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 440 grams (0.97 pounds) | 680 grams (1.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 127 x 74 x 52mm (5.0" x 2.9" x 2.0") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 500 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-95 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $899 | $5,479 |