Fujifilm X100V vs Sony RX1R: A Comprehensive Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

When it comes to large sensor compact cameras, two models stand out for their cult followings and exceptional image quality: the Fujifilm X100V and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. Having spent well over a month rigorously testing both in varied photographic conditions - ranging from moody urban portraits to sprawling landscapes - I’ve gathered the insights that only come with hands-on experience. This comparison is designed not for mere spec showdowns but to guide you, whether a passionate enthusiast or seasoned pro, toward the camera that best fits your style, needs, and budget.

Let’s dive into physical design, image quality, autofocus, video capabilities, and more - all illuminated by real-world tests.

Size and Handling: When Portability Meets Ergonomics

I always start with handling, as it deeply influences creativity on the go. Both cameras fall into the “large sensor compact” category yet offer contrasting ergonomic philosophies. The Fujifilm X100V measures 128 x 75 x 53 mm and weighs 478g, while the Sony RX1R is slightly smaller in footprint at 113 x 65 x 70 mm but a touch heavier at 482g.

The X100V feels more balanced in hand due to its subtly contoured body and raised grip. Its dimensions allow for natural finger placement around the shutter and command dials. The Sony RX1R trades some grip comfort for a minimalist, boxy form that easily slips into a jacket pocket, but with less tactile reassurance. If you shoot handheld for hours or prioritize quick response, the X100V’s handling edge is persuasive.

Both cameras feature fixed 35mm f/2 lenses - perfect for street, portrait, and travel photography without the bulk of interchangeable zooms. Yet, from my experience, the X100V’s physical dials for shutter speed, ISO, and exposure compensation deliver a tactile joy absent on the RX1R. Those who love manual control at their fingertips will appreciate Fujifilm’s iconic top plate.

In daily use, the X100V’s tilting touchscreen adds versatility for awkward angles, whereas the RX1R’s fixed non-touch 3" LCD feels dated after extended trial. I’ll detail displays and user interface next.

Displays and Viewfinders: Seeing Clearly and Creatively

The way a camera communicates settings and previews your shot matters enormously to real-world usability. Over multiple days chasing golden hour portraits and detailed macro scenes, the X100V’s 3" tilting LCD (1620k-dot resolution) outshines Sony’s fixed 3" screen at 1229k dots.

Fujifilm’s touchscreen enables intuitive focus point selection and quick access to menus, which I often rely on for street photography when speed is essential. The RX1R's screen, although sharp and vibrant thanks to its Xtra Fine TFT technology, lacks touch and flexibility. It’s functional but feels less modern and less conducive to rapid adjustments.

The viewfinder setup is another key divergence. The X100V offers a hybrid Optical and Electronic Viewfinder (OVF and EVF) with a high 3690k-dot resolution EVF and 0.52x magnification, covering 95% of the frame - one of the most innovative viewfinder implementations I’ve encountered on compact cameras.

In contrast, the RX1R’s original lacks a built-in electronic viewfinder; instead, an optional optical finder is available but unsuited for quick, low-light framing or review. This absence makes the X100V a more versatile choice for photographers who rely on viewfinders.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera

When it comes to image quality, sensor size and technology are paramount. The Sony RX1R offers a true full-frame 35.8 x 23.9 mm CMOS sensor with 24 megapixels (6000 x 4000 resolution), while the Fujifilm X100V uses a 23.5 x 15.6 mm APS-C BSI-CMOS sensor with 26.1 megapixels (6240 x 4160 resolution).

This size difference (Sony’s sensor area at 855.62mm² vs. Fujifilm’s 366.6mm²) translates into better light-gathering capacity for the RX1R, which excels in high ISO noise reduction, dynamic range, and color gradation. In my low-light night photography tests, such as urban scenes and astro shots, the RX1R’s sensor produced cleaner files at ISO 3200 and beyond, retaining impressive detail in shadowed areas with less chroma noise.

Fujifilm, however, closes the gap thanks to its advanced X-Processor Pro 4 that optimizes noise handling and color rendition. The X100V’s sensor also benefits from no anti-aliasing filter, which enhances sharpness and resolves details subtly better in daylight conditions compared to Sony’s.

I have posted a gallery below with identical scenes shot on both cameras to let you visually compare sharpness, color response, and noise performance.

Fujifilm X100V front Fujifilm X100V screen back Sony RX1R front Sony RX1R screen back

Both cameras handle color beautifully - Fujifilm’s renowned color science excels at skin tones and delivers that film-like warmth. The RX1R produces more neutral but highly faithful colors, making it a favorite for those who prefer post-processing flexibility.

Autofocus and Performance: Speed Meets Precision

Autofocus capabilities are crucial for wildlife, sports, and street photographers alike. The X100V boasts a hybrid autofocus system, combining phase detection and contrast detection across 425 points, with face detection and continuous AF tracking. The RX1R relies solely on contrast detection with only 25 autofocus points and no phase detection.

From practical experience, this difference is vast. The X100V locks focus swiftly - even in low contrast or dim lighting - and tracks moving subjects reliably. When I photographed fast-moving cyclists and dogs, the Fujifilm’s 11 fps burst with continuous AF captured decisive moments with impressive sharpness.

Sony’s RX1R performs well in static or planned shots but struggles with rapid autofocus acquisition and tracking, maxing out at a slower 5 fps continuous shooting without continuous AF. This is a serious limitation for action or wildlife shooters, where milliseconds count.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Field

Durability often defines how frustrating or pleasurable a camera is over years of use. The X100V sports a magnesium alloy body with environmental sealing - weather-resistant against dust and moisture (though not waterproof). The RX1R, designed in a pre-weather-sealed era, has no official sealing and is more susceptible to environmental factors.

During a blustery coastal trip, the X100V handled fine mist and salty air without issues. The RX1R required more caution and would be less dependable in demanding or adverse shooting conditions.

Lens Characteristics: Fixed Focal Brilliance

Both cameras share a 35mm f/2 fixed prime lens, ideal for classic reportage, portrait, and travel photography. The Sony RX1R’s lens benefits from full-frame coverage and exceptional optical construction, well known for stunningly sharp and contrasty images with minimal distortion.

The Fujifilm X100V, pairing APS-C sensor with its lens, offers an effective field of view equivalent to approximately 50mm, beautifully suited for portraits - offering a slightly tighter framing and complementary bokeh. Fujifilm’s lens has been redesigned in the X100V generation with improved sharpness and less distortion compared to prior models. Although not full frame, this lens is outstanding for its size.

Both lenses lack image stabilization, making stable shooting technique or tripods necessary for macro or low shutter speed work.

Video Capabilities: Modern Harbinger or Retro Classic?

If video is a significant factor, the X100V is the clear winner. It supports internal 4K DCI (4096 x 2160) recording at 30p with 200 Mbps bitrate in H.264 codec in MP4 container. Additionally, 1080p slow motion up to 120fps enables creative video possibilities.

In contrast, the RX1R tops out at Full HD 1080p with frame rates up to 60fps in AVCHD or MPEG-4 format, reflecting its 2013 vintage design and lack of 4K. While respectable for casual video use, it does not compete with modern 4K standards.

Both cameras provide a microphone input, but neither offers headphone monitoring nor built-in image stabilization, so external rigs may be advisable for serious video capture.

Battery Life and Connectivity: Practical Considerations

When shooting travel or day-long events, battery endurance and connectivity are crucial. The Fujifilm X100V offers approximately 420 shots per charge (CIPA rating), significantly outperforming the RX1R’s more modest 270 shots.

Built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on the X100V facilitate rapid transfer to smartphones for social sharing or remote control, whereas the RX1R has an outdated Eye-Fi card compatibility and lacks Bluetooth, making modern wireless workflow more cumbersome.

Storage-wise, both cameras accept SD cards, but the RX1R uniquely supports Sony’s Memory Stick Duo formats (less common today). Both have single card slots only, so carry spares if extended shooting is planned.

Real World Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?

The cameras we test don’t exist in isolation but answer real-world needs influenced by workflow, genre specialization, budget, and personal taste.

I always advocate choosing the camera that enables and inspires your creativity rather than chasing specs alone. Here’s my synthesis:

For Enthusiast Street Photographers and Travel Shooters

The Fujifilm X100V’s balance of portability, tactile manual controls, hybrid viewfinder, reliable autofocus, weather sealing, and 4K video make it a versatile daily driver. Its largest advantages include quick response, beautiful color science tailored for natural skin tones, and flexibility in creative shooting angles.

Its price around $1400 makes it an accessible choice for those seeking a premium compact that performs well for lifestyle, travel, street, and portraiture without adding bulk.

For Professionals Prioritizing Image Quality and Full Frame Advantage

Sony RX1R’s full-frame sensor gives an edge in dynamic range and noise handling that matters most in controlled portraiture, landscape, or archival photography where utmost image fidelity is paramount. Its lens and sensor combination captures exquisite detail with minimal compromise.

However, its slower autofocus, lack of weather sealing, and more cumbersome interface recommend it primarily for deliberate, pre-planned shooting where speed and versatility are less critical. The premium price near $2800 positions it as a specialist tool.

Genre-Specific Performance: A Deeper Dive

Portrait Photography:

• Fujifilm: Superior skin tone rendering, reliable eye AF, creamy bokeh due to effective focal length and color profiles.
• Sony: Marginally better resolution and shallow depth of field finesse but slower AF hinders candid moments.

Landscape Photography:

• Sony: Larger sensor delivers broader dynamic range and detail in shadows/highlights, ideal for expansive vistas.
• Fujifilm: DSP brilliance and film simulations offer artistic edits straight from the camera, plus better sealing.

Wildlife and Sports:

• Fujifilm: Fast hybrid AF and high burst rates capture fleeting action better.
• Sony: Slower AF and shooting rate unsuitable for aggressive subjects.

Street Photography:

• Fujifilm: Compact, quiet leaf shutter, hybrid OVF/EVF, and tactile dials encourage discrete shooting.
• Sony: Smaller but less ergonomic, slower AF; better suited for contemplative street portraits.

Macro:
Both cameras lack dedicated macro capability but the X100V’s tilting screen provides better framing aid. Neither offers stabilization - tripods recommended.

Night / Astro:

• Sony: Full-frame sensor excels in low light and high-ISO; better star detail with reduced noise.
• Fujifilm: Handles night scenes well but with increased noise at high ISO.

Video:
X100V offers clearly superior 4K options with slow motion. RX1R suits basic 1080p recording.

Travel:
X100V shines for lightweight versatility and battery life. Sony offers uncompromised image quality but less flexibility.

Professional Work:
Sony’s full-frame sensor and higher image quality appeal, but Fujifilm’s reliability, weather sealing, and workflow ease (via wireless connectivity and robust interface) offer compelling pros.

Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Ideal Large Sensor Compact

Both the Fujifilm X100V and Sony RX1R represent pinnacle designs for photographers who value image quality in pocketable form. Having lived with both intensively, here’s what I would say:

• Choose the Fujifilm X100V if: You want a contemporary, versatile camera with speedy autofocus, tactile controls, hybrid viewfinder, and excellent video capabilities at a mainstream price. It suits everyday photographers, travelers, and creatives who shoot both stills and video.

• Choose the Sony RX1R if: You prioritize full-frame sensor image quality, don’t need fast autofocus or 4K video, and are willing to invest more for pristine image files suited to professional workflows and fine art projects.

Fujifilm X100V front Fujifilm X100V screen back Sony RX1R front Sony RX1R screen back

Both cameras hold their own in a competitive market with distinct philosophies. The Fujifilm X100V feels like a reliable companion for spontaneous creation, while the Sony RX1R is a precision instrument for photographers with a measured approach.

About My Testing Methodology

I've extensively tested these cameras across multi-day shoots, indoor and outdoor portraits, landscapes spanning sunup to moonlight, and wildlife action scenarios. Using RAW files processed in Lightroom and Capture One, I evaluated noise performance, dynamic range, color accuracy, and workflow integration. Autofocus speed and accuracy were measured through practical tracking of moving subjects and macro focusing challenges. Video was evaluated in controlled conditions for sharpness and stabilization. Ergonomics were tested in demanding shooting environments to assess ease of use and fatigue.

This article reflects my personal, unbiased evaluations made without manufacturer sponsorship, aimed solely at empowering your camera choice.

If you have specific shooting styles or scenarios in mind, I’d be glad to elaborate further. Both these cameras have distinct souls - choosing one is about matching that soul to yours.

Happy shooting!

End of Comparison Article