Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M1 II was manufactured 4 years later than the VR-340 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1 II scores versus the VR-340 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus VR-340

 E-M1 II VR-340 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2012More recent by 58 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kSharper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 VR-340 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VR-340

 E-M1 II VR-340 
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the VR-340.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and VR-340 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and VR-340.

Clearly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
76
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW files
34
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Street photography advice
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus via touch
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (125g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography information
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low battery life (350 per charge)
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Olympus VR-340
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment proof
boasts focus via touch
good megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
low battery life (350 per charge)
69
lighter than others (125 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
low battery life (350 per charge)
43
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging highlights
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic socket
lighter than competition in class (574g)
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than others (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus VR-340
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus VR-340
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2016-09-19 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-5.7
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 125 grams (0.28 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 One
Pricing at release $1,700 $130