Fujifilm X100V vs Sony RX1R II: The Ultimate Large Sensor Compact Showdown

Large sensor compacts occupy a very special spot in my gear bag: they deliver near-professional image quality and control in pocketable, stealthy bodies. No fuss, no vast lens collections to tote around, just serious photo power in a tidy package. But when I stack up the Fujifilm X100V against Sony’s RX1R II, the stakes get high - two iconic fixed-lens compacts, each with loyal followings. I’ve lived with both extensively, running them through the gauntlet of conditions you actual photographers put them through: landscapes, portraits, street, wildlife, video, and even some night sky astro shooting.

In this comprehensive and honest comparison, I’ll break down the real-world performance, technical chops, and everyday usability of each camera - throwing in my boots-on-the-ground perspective about which one suits your style and budget best.

Let’s kick things off with sizing and ergonomics because trust me, when you're carrying gear all day, this matters.

Quick Look at Size and Handling: Classic Compact vs. Pocket Power

Right out of the gate, the Fuji X100V and Sony RX1R II both feel like high-end, serious tools - but they approach compactness differently.

The Fujifilm X100V sports a slightly larger footprint (128x75x53 mm) compared to the RX1R II’s boxy, denser shape (113x65x72 mm), though the Sony edges out lighter by a few grams (507g vs 478g for Fuji). Fuji’s more streamlined profile and textured grip make it comfortable for long handheld use, especially for shooters who appreciate clubs for their thumbs like me. It's friendly, predictable, and built for quick, grab-and-go work.

Sony’s RX1R II is chunkier and boxier, feeling a bit more like a “serious technician's tool” - solid but less comfy for extended handheld bouts. The bulkier body partly comes from the full-frame sensor, which requires intricate engineering to fit such a powerful sensor behind a fixed 35mm f/2 lens.

In practice, if you want pure pocketability, the Fujifilm edges out thanks to its lower height and slimmer profile. For dedicated street shooters or travelers who want to disappear into the environment, the Fuji is less conspicuous too.

Controls Up Close: Intuitive or Over-Engineered?

If controls and ergonomics count more than specs on paper, the X100V deserves top marks. Fuji loves tactile dials and buttons, perfect for photographers coming from traditional film cameras or DSLRs. Dedicated shutter speed wheels, aperture rings, and ISO dials let you shoot instinctively without diving into menus - a godsend for street and event photographers who can’t afford to miss the shot fiddling with settings.

Sony’s RX1R II is more button-heavy and a little more menu-dependent. Its lack of touchscreen makes navigation slower, especially for modern shooters used to tapping away. The customizability is present but feels a bit buried compared to Fuji’s consistently tactile approach with its dials and lobbed knobs. For rapid-fire shooting, Fuji’s physical feedback wins hands down.

If you’re the type who enjoys physical engagement with controls and want all your clubs for thumbs right on the surface, X100V’s usability will feel natural. The Sony is still well-built and refined but definitely less intuitive.

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: APS-C Versus Full-Frame Battles

Now for the heart of the matter - imaging power.

The Sony RX1R II packs a gorgeous 42.4MP full-frame BSI CMOS sensor measuring 35.9 x 24 mm. This monstrosity dwarfs the Fujfilm X100V’s 26.1MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor - roughly 2.3 times larger in sensor area. In terms of pure image quality potential, sensor size and pixel count give Sony the upper hand on paper.

How does that translate in real-world shooting? The RX1R II delivers:

• Unmatched resolution and detail, especially when pixel peeping prints larger than 24 inches or cropping heavily.
• Exceptional dynamic range, scoring an impressive 13.9 EV in independent tests (DxOMark), capturing highlights and shadows with silky gradations.
• Superior color depth and tonality, offering subtle transitions in skin tones and landscape scenes.

But don’t discount the X100V - it squeezes the best juice out of APS-C technology with Fuji's X-Processor Pro 4, yielding vibrant yet natural colors, punchy contrast, and very respectable dynamic range. Although it can’t beat full-frame’s ultimate latitude, the X100V excels with gorgeous medium ISO performance, high-contrast landscapes, and sharp portraits.

Regarding sensitivity, the RX1R II runs from ISO 50 to a whopping 102,400 (boosted). Fuji’s range is 160-12,800 native ISO with high ISO expansion to 51,200, which means Sony dominates the extreme low and high sensitivity battle.

If you frequently shoot large format prints, commercial work needing ultimate image fidelity, or are critical about ultimate dynamic range for landscape or studio use, Sony’s sensor pulls ahead noticeably.

For street shooters, travel photographers, and most portrait shooters who don’t need razor-sharp 42MP files all the time, Fuji’s APS-C sensor balances perfect image quality with more manageable file sizes and snappier processing.

Rear LCD & Viewfinder Experience: Hybrid or Traditional Views?

The Fuji X100V features a 3-inch tilting touchscreen LCD with 1.62M dots resolution - responsive, bright, and very handy for composing tricky angles or quick focus adjustments (touch-to-focus is a joy on Fuji). It combines this with an innovative hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder offering 95% coverage and 0.52x magnification - a unique split-image window for those who love optical clarity mixed with overlay info.

Sony’s RX1R II sticks to a 3-inch tilting non-touch LCD at 1.23M dots, paired with a 0.74x magnification electronic viewfinder only at 100% coverage. Its EVF delivers a crystal-clear, big image for precise framing but lacks optical viewfinder options.

Which is better? Fuji’s hybrid viewfinder appeals to rangefinder purists and street shooters who want that classic shooting experience with digital perks. Sony’s fully electronic EVF is more modern and gives extra info overlays, but might require a slight adaptation if you come from optical finder backgrounds.

Touchscreen usability is a standout Fuji feature for focus control and menu navigation - something I sorely missed on Sony when I wanted to adjust quick settings or explore focus grids.

Autofocus & Burst Rates: Speed, Accuracy and Tracking in the Real World

For many enthusiasts and pros alike, autofocus performance separates the wheat from the chaff.

Fujifilm’s X100V uses a hybrid phase- and contrast-detection system with a very dense field of 425 AF points, offering fast, reliable, and versatile autofocus. Eye- and face-detection work smoothly, and the 11fps burst rate puts it ahead in capturing fleeting moments. For action, street candid, and sports-like scenarios, combined with snappy AF, the X100V delivers real jaw-dropping responsiveness.

Sony’s RX1R II, while having an excellent sensor, features fewer focus points and a lower burst shooting rate. Its AF speed is respectable for portraits and landscape but struggles a bit in fast-moving subjects compared to Fuji’s newer, faster AF engine. Eye autofocus is present but less polished than modern mirrorless counterparts.

If your photography involves capturing wildlife in flight, kids playing, events with quick moments, Fuji’s continuous shooting and autofocus will better cover your needs.

Lens & Optical Performance: The Battle of the 35mm Fixed

Both cameras feature fixed 35mm f/2 prime lenses, a perfect “all-rounder” focal length, but differences in design influence ultimate image rendering.

• Fujifilm X100V: Features the new redesigned lens with improved sharpness, minimized distortion, and a more flexible close focusing distance (about 10cm), suitable for close portraits and some macro-ish details. Built with classic Fujinon glass renowned for characterful rendering and beautiful JPEG film simulations.
• Sony RX1R II: Boasts a legendary Zeiss 35mm f/2 lens, critically praised for its razor-sharp center across the frame, ultra-smooth bokeh, and minimal chromatic aberrations. Macro focusing is good down to 14cm, allowing crisp close-ups. This lens is top-tier for professional-quality detail and creamy backgrounds.

Image output wise, Sony’s lens delivers more pixel-level detail, owed partly to higher resolution and full-frame optics. Fuji’s lens shines with its analogue warmth and delivers excellent edge-to-edge sharpness, especially optimized with APS-C sensor size.

In practical use, both lenses are stellar - but Fuji’s vibrance and film simulations make it a favorite for expressive portrait and street photography. Sony’s lens nudges out with superior rendering for print and studio work where critical sharpness is king.

Durability & Weather Sealing: Ready for Real-World Adventure?

Only the Fujifilm X100V offers weather sealing, meaning it can withstand light rain, dust, and general tough environments better. This feature alone makes Fuji preferable for landscape photographers, travelers, or anyone shooting outdoors in uncertain weather conditions.

Sony RX1R II does not have weather sealing, so you’ll need extra caution if shooting in wet or dusty environments.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Running Times & Workflow

Battery life on the Fuji X100V is essentially double Sony's RX1R II, which is a significant practical advantage on travel or long shoots where swapping batteries isn’t ideal. Charging and tethering are also more modern with Fuji’s USB 3.1 port versus Sony’s older USB 2.0 standard.

Both cameras support wireless image transfer, but Fuji adds Bluetooth for faster pairing and low power consumption. For professionals looking for connectivity flexibility, Fuji is a step ahead here.

Video Capabilities: Not Hollywood, But Useful Footage

Though primarily stills cameras, each delivers some video options:

• Fujifilm X100V: Shines with 4K UHD up to 30fps with high bitrates (200 Mbps), supporting H.264 codec and linear PCM audio. Fuji’s video is surprisingly solid for a large sensor compact and includes F-Log recording for color grading in post-production.
• Sony RX1R II: Limited to Full HD (1080p) at up to 60fps, no 4K, and uses AVCHD/XAVC S codecs.

If filmmaking or occasional video capture is on your list, Fuji’s capabilities far outshine Sony’s, giving you flexibility in resolution and recording modes.

How Do They Stack Up in Real-World Genres?

Let’s get detailed about who should pick which depending on what you shoot:

Fujifilm X100V front Fujifilm X100V screen back Sony RX1R II front Sony RX1R II screen back

Value Analysis: Price vs Performance

Sony’s RX1R II is nearly 2.5x the price of Fuji X100V - a hefty premium justified only if you truly need ultimate resolution, full-frame depth, and Zeiss optics in a compact body.

Fuji is a spectacular bang-for-buck pro-level tool for enthusiasts wanting quality, speed, and modern convenience without breaking the bank.

Wrapping It Up: Which One Should You Pick?

If your photography is mainly:

• Street, Travel, Everyday, Portraits - The Fujifilm X100V is your camera. It feels intuitive, shoots fast, handles a variety of conditions, and keeps your wallet happy.
• Landscape or Studio, Commercial, Large Prints - Sony RX1R II shines here with its fine detail, full-frame capabilities, and superior optics. But be prepared for compromises in handling and cost.
• Video - Fuji’s modern 4K modes and video features clearly outclass Sony.
• Sports or Wildlife - Fuji’s AF speed and burst rate again make it a better tool for fast subjects.

Final Thoughts from the Field

In my experience handling both, the X100V is a camera you’ll love to carry every day. It’s friendly, fast, and reliably produces vibrant images without fuss. The hybrid optical viewfinder is a game changer for street shooters who want a vintage feel with digital benefits. Fuji have really thought about the user interface and battery life, making it ideal for prolonged shoots in diverse scenarios.

The Sony RX1R II, on the other hand, is a precision instrument for the pixel-peeping perfectionist. It’s not just a camera; it’s a statement piece for serious professionals who demand uncompromised full-frame quality in a pocket camera - if you have the budget and the patience to tolerate its quirks.

If you want my honest, down-to-earth take: Choose the Fuji X100V unless your work specifically calls for super-high resolution full-frame imaging and you have the budget to match. Fuji covers more bases better and with fewer frustrations, making it the smarter, more versatile choice for most shooters.

Happy shooting, and remember… the best camera is the one you enjoy carrying and using, not just the one with the flashiest specs!

End of article