Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm X10
- Successor is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm X20 and Kodak C135, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the C135 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and C135 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X20 was introduced 16 months later than the C135 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Fujifilm X20 matches up versus the C135 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X20 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Kodak C135
| Fujifilm X20 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 16 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 2.8" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.4") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 112k | Crisper screen (+348k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Fujifilm X20
| C135 | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Kodak C135
| Fujifilm X20 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 comes with outer dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Kodak C135 has dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X20 and Kodak C135 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 against the C135.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and C135 is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and C135.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 with its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Kodak C135 will resolve greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X20 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1250 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.8" | 2.4" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 lb) | 175g (0.39 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $500 | $0 |