Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950
Portability
83 Imaging
39 Features
59 Overall
47
83 Imaging
39 Features
59 Overall
47
Portability
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X10
- Replacement is Fujifilm X30
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Announced June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and Z950 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X20 was released 2 years later than the Z950 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X20 scores vs the Z950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X20 & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm X20 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm X20
| Z950 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Kodak Z950
| Fujifilm X20 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X20 has got exterior measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has specifications of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs the Z950.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and Z950 is 83 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X20 and Z950.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 offers the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The more recent Fujifilm X20 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X20 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak Z950 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
above average flash sync (1/1,000s)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
focusing manually
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X20 Street photography factors
Kodak Z950 Street photography factors
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (2/3")
more heavy than competition in class (353 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition (243g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Fujifilm X20 Sports photography info
Kodak Z950 Sports photography info
image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery life (270 per charge)
sensor has phase detect AF
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250 seconds)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X20 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery life (270 CIPA)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (353 grams)
low MP (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
built-in flash
long reach (350mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (243 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X20 Landscape photography features
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography features
focusing manually
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (2.8 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (270 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (2/3")
no Timelapse mode
focusing manually
screen is a good size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X20 Vlogging factors
Kodak Z950 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (353 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competition (243 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm X20 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-04-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1/8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/1000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 grams (0.78 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $250 |
