Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Released April 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm X10
- Updated by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X20 was introduced 3 years later than the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X20 grades against the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X20 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm X20 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2013 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 41 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Fujifilm X20
| Tough-3000 | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus Tough-3000
| Fujifilm X20 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 has got physical dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs the Tough-3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and Tough-3000 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and Tough-3000.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 provides the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh easier. The fresher Fujifilm X20 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-04-29 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $500 | $0 |