Clicky

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
83
Imaging
38
Features
59
Overall
46
Fujifilm X20 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 2.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
  • 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
  • Launched April 2013
  • Earlier Model is Fujifilm X10
  • Updated by Fujifilm X30
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Here is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm X20 versus Olympus TG-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and TG-320 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm X20 was released 16 months later than the TG-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm X20 scores versus the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm X20 TG-320 
LaunchedApril 2013January 2012Fresher by 16 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display size2.8"2.7"Larger display (+0.1")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm X20

 TG-320 Fujifilm X20 

Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus TG-320

 Fujifilm X20 TG-320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X20 provides exterior dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm X20 versus Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X20 against the TG-320.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and TG-320 is 83 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specifications. The photograph below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and TG-320.

Plainly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-320 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X20 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography highlights
46
manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/1,000s)
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
58
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor (2/3")
more heavy than competitors in class (353g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than others (155g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X20
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
52
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
good battery life (270 shots)
comes with phase detect AF
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (150 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X20 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
60
good battery life (270 shots)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (353g)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not have a selfie friendly display
67
lighter than others (155g)
environment proof
decent megapixels (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X20 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
55
manual focus
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (2.8")
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (270 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (12MP)
very small sensor (2/3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
bad battery (150 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X20 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging information
31
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (353 grams)
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than others (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X20 and Olympus TG-320
 Fujifilm X20Olympus TG-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X20 Olympus TG-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2013-04-29 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR Processor II TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CCD
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-2.8 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 4.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.8" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (tunnel) None
Viewfinder coverage 85 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 12.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m 5.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/1000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 353 grams (0.78 lb) 155 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 270 pictures 150 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $500 $0