Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X10
- Successor is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and CX2 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X20 was announced 3 years later than the CX2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm X20 grades against the CX2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm X20 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2013 | August 2009 | More recent by 45 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Fujifilm X20
| CX2 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm X20 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 provides physical dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X20 against the CX2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and CX2 is 83 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching specifications. The visual underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and CX2.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X20 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X20 will render more detail with its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X20 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-04-29 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/1000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 353 gr (0.78 pounds) | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $341 |