Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Announced April 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X10
- Refreshed by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and PX (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X20 was launched 21 months after the PX making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm X20 matches up against the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X20 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm X20 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 21 months |
| Display size | 2.8" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.1") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm X20
| PX | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh PX
| Fujifilm X20 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 has got outside dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X20 versus the PX.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and PX is 83 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X20 and PX.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X20 because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh PX will result in more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X20 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh PX |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-04-29 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 grams (0.78 pounds) | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $500 | $329 |