Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Released April 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X10
- Successor is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X20 was introduced 16 months prior to the WG-M1 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X20 scores versus the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X20 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm X20 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 2.8" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm X20
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | April 2013 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm X20 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X20 has got outside measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X20 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and WG-M1 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X20 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X20 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-M1 will produce more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X20 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm X20 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm X20 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-04-29 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | 350 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $2,000 |