Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102
83 Imaging
39 Features
59 Overall
47
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X10
- Replacement is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and SL102 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X20 was announced 4 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm X20 grades against the SL102 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X20 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm X20 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 53 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display size | 2.8" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm X20
| SL102 | Fujifilm X20 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm X20 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X20 has outside dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 against the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and SL102 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X20 and SL102.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X20 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X20 will offer you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X20 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternative name | - | ES55 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-04-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.8" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $500 | $130 |
