Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Older Model is Fujifilm X10
- Updated by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and WB350F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm X20 was announced 8 months before the WB350F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X20 grades versus the WB350F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X20 & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X20 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm X20
| WB350F | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | April 2013 | Newer by 8 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X20 has outer measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X20 and the WB350F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and WB350F is 83 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X20 and WB350F.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X20 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/1000 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 353 grams (0.78 lbs) | 276 grams (0.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $500 | $260 |