Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Announced April 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm X10
- Updated by Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and WB50F (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X20 was introduced 8 months earlier than the WB50F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X20 grades versus the WB50F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X20 and Samsung WB50F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB50F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Fujifilm X20
| WB50F | Fujifilm X20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | April 2013 | More recent by 8 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Samsung WB50F
| Fujifilm X20 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X20 has got external dimensions of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") and a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X20 versus Samsung WB50F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X20 against the WB50F.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X20 and WB50F is 83 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X20 and WB50F.
Clearly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X20 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB50F will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X20 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm X20 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm X20 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-04-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.8" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 85 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 353g (0.78 pounds) | 207g (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $180 |