Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000
80 Imaging
39 Features
73 Overall
52
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 423g - 119 x 72 x 60mm
- Launched August 2014
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm X30 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X30 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm X30 (2/3") and 9000 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X30 was released 5 years after the 9000 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X30 grades vs the 9000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X30 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X30 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X30 over the Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm X30 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2014 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 65 months |
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Fujifilm X30
| 9000 | Fujifilm X30 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X30 and Olympus 9000
| Fujifilm X30 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X30 has got external dimensions of 119mm x 72mm x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") along with a weight of 423 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X30 and Olympus 9000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X30 compared to the 9000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X30 and 9000 is 80 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X30 and 9000.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X30 provides the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The more recent Fujifilm X30 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Fujifilm X30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-08-26 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.65x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, commander, suppressed flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 423g (0.93 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 119 x 72 x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $499 | $300 |
