Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus XZ-10
80 Imaging
39 Features
73 Overall
52


91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 423g - 119 x 72 x 60mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013

Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus Stylus XZ-10: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Small Sensor Compacts
When it comes to compact cameras designed for enthusiasts who demand more than smartphone snapshots without lugging around a bulky DSLR or mirrorless system, the Fujifilm X30 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10 (XZ-10 for short) have long been recognized contenders in the small sensor compact category. Although both came out over half a decade ago, these cameras remain interesting study cases for how manufacturers squeezed features and performance from tiny sensors, combining precision optics, control-rich designs, and advanced imaging chemistry within pocket-friendly bodies.
Having spent extensive time with both cameras - more than a few real-world shoots, lab tests, and comparisons - I want to take you through a comprehensive analysis that touches on everything from sensor tech to ergonomics and usability, from autofocus precision to video capabilities, and from specialized photographic genres to overall value. By the end, you’ll have a clear picture of which model suits your style and needs, and why.
Size and Handling: Ergonomics That Speak Volumes
First impressions matter, right? And there is no better way to start this comparison than placing both cameras side-by-side physically to appreciate the design philosophies.
At 119 x 72 x 60 mm and tipping the scales at 423 grams, the Fujifilm X30 is noticeably chunkier and heavier compared to the Olympus XZ-10’s leaner 102 x 61 x 34 mm frame with a mere 221 grams weight. That heft and girth on the X30 aren’t accidental - Fuji has carved out deliberate space for a substantial grip and intuitive handling controls, even placing a pop-up flash within easy reach.
This form factor difference closely translates into shooting comfort and control precision. In practice, Fujifilm’s X30 feels like a miniature rangefinder or retro-style enthusiast camera - it exudes confidence in hand, with buttons and dials that snap well under the thumb and index finger during quick transitions between settings. The optical viewfinder complemented by the electronic finder adds versatility when composing in very bright outdoors, though the EVF mode can be a mixed bag depending on individual eyesight and tolerance for lag.
The Olympus XZ-10 caters to minimalists and travelers, favoring a squeezable slenderness and compactness over handling prominence. For street or travel photographers seeking discretion and pocketability, this is a significant advantage. However, the absence of a viewfinder and fewer physical dials shift the operational style more towards touchscreen interaction (which the X30 lacks). The thinner body inherently sacrifices the refinement of control placement, demanding more on-screen navigation and menu button use.
If your photography involves fast adjustments, such as event shooting or street candidness where fleeting moments matter, the X30’s bulk gains you speed and confidence. For casual or travel shooting where pocket space and weight dominate priorities, the XZ-10’s form factor likely wins.
Design and Control Surfaces: Navigating the Options
Looking closely from above reveals how Fuji and Olympus adopted contrasting approaches to control layout and interface design.
The X30’s top panel comprises dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive modes, plus a well-positioned power switch and shutter button with an integrated zoom toggle. The logical, tactile layout invites you to shoot reflexively, without needing to glance down - a vital asset when capturing decisive moments. The presence of an electronic viewfinder and hot shoe add classic photographic chops to the toolkit.
Contrast this with the Olympus XZ-10’s more pared-back top design: fewer physical dials, a singular mode dial, and no viewfinder or hot shoe. The reliance on touchscreen (which the Olympus supports while Fuji does not) replaces some manual interactions but can slow input in fast-paced contexts.
I often find that while touchscreens are game changers for casual photographers or video shooters, enthusiasts used to dial-heavy cameras might find themselves wishing for more physical controls on the XZ-10. At the same time, beginners or those upgrading from smartphones might embrace the touchscreen for its learning curve and flexibility.
Sensor Spec and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Though neither the X30 nor the XZ-10 sports a large sensor - both use sub-1-inch sensors - the differences lie in sensor technology and resultant image quality that directly impact your photographs’ sharpness, dynamic range, and noise performance.
Sensor Technology
- Fujifilm X30 uses a 2/3-inch CMOS X-Trans II sensor (measuring 8.8 x 6.6 mm, approx. 58.1 mm² sensor area) with 12-megapixel resolution. The X-Trans sensor is known for an unconventional color filter array designed to reduce the need for an anti-aliasing filter, thereby boosting perceived sharpness and color fidelity.
- Olympus XZ-10 employs a typical 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm, approx. 28.1 mm² sensor area) also at 12 megapixels. The backside illumination helps improve light gathering, a plus in low-light conditions for smaller sensors.
In practice, the X30’s larger and more advanced sensor delivers superior color reproducibility and fine detail, producing cleaner images especially when pushed beyond ISO 800. The XZ-10, while respectable, struggles relatively more with noise at higher ISOs due to smaller sensing surface and older architecture. Low light shooters concerned with image cleanliness and gradation will generally prefer the X30’s advantages here.
Resolution and Dynamic Range
Both share a similar pixel count (~12MP), offering adequate resolution for web use, prints up to A3 size, and general shooting. However, Fuji’s sensor combined with its EXR Processor II manages a better dynamic range - meaning it retains more details in shadows and highlights without clipping, an essential trait for landscape and portraiture in tricky lighting.
One limitation to note is that XZ-10 maxes out at ISO 6400, while the X30 pushes ISO up to 12,800, though this is more practical than usable, given noise considerations.
LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Your Shots
In real-world shooting, composing your frame and reviewing images quickly is critical.
Both cameras sport 3-inch LCD displays at 920k-dot resolution - adequate for viewing sharpness, focus confirmation, and image review. Yet, the X30 boasts a tilting screen, providing shooting flexibility from high angles or hip level - a feature Olympus does not offer on the fixed screen of the XZ-10.
Because the XZ-10 lacks a viewfinder entirely, outdoor composition with bright sunlight can be challenging, pushing the user towards the screen which may sometimes wash out in direct sunlight. The X30’s built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2.36M dots comes as a major usability plus, granting precision framing and stability in glare-heavy conditions.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy in the Field
Autofocus performance can make or break your shooting experience, especially in dynamic environments like sports or wildlife.
- Fujifilm X30: Uses 49 focus points, with hybrid autofocusing - contrast and phase detection combined. It supports continuous autofocus (AF-C) and face detection.
- Olympus XZ-10: Operates 35 contrast-detection AF points, with continuous AF but no phase detection, and face detection supported.
During my field tests tracking moving subjects, the Fuji’s hybrid AF proved noticeably quicker and more reliable, especially under changing light or tricky backlit scenarios. The phase detection grid allows the X30 to lock focus faster and maintain tracking better, valuable for active shooting like street photography or moderate wildlife.
The XZ-10’s contrast-detection-only system performed adequately with stationary or slow-moving subjects but struggled with fast action - lagging and occasionally hunting for focus. This aligns with its lower continuous shooting rate (5 fps vs 12 fps on the Fuji).
Lens Characteristics: Zoom Range and Aperture Quality
Both cameras feature fixed zoom lenses, designed around their small sensors but with divergent focal and aperture ranges:
Camera | Focal Length (35mm equiv.) | Max Aperture |
---|---|---|
Fujifilm X30 | 28-112 mm (4× zoom) | f/2.0-2.8 |
Olympus XZ-10 | 26-130 mm (5× zoom) | f/1.8-2.7 |
The Fujifilm lens begins slightly more telephoto but offers a wider aperture at the wide end, making it bright enough for portraits and background separation in moderate zoom. Coupled with the X-Trans sensor, this lens delivers impressively sharp results across the zoom range, with sturdy bokeh quality for small sensor cameras.
The Olympus boasts a longer zoom reach extending to 130mm. At the wide end, the f/1.8 aperture is a significant asset for low light and shallow depth of field effects, which is particularly useful when shooting street scenes or environmental portraits. However, sharpness suffers slightly towards telephoto zoom settings, which is a common trade-off in compact zooms.
For macro use, both cameras offer a minimum focusing distance of around 1cm, enabling creative close-up shots. The Fuji’s optical stabilization and lens sharpness tend to yield crisper macro images in handheld conditions.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Depth: Capturing the Decisive Moment
Continuous shooting capabilities are vital for action, wildlife, and sports photographers.
- Fujifilm X30: Offers an impressive 12 frames per second burst rate.
- Olympus XZ-10: More modest 5 frames per second rate.
The X30’s buffer allows for sustained bursts before slowing, helpful for scenarios like sports or wildlife where moment-to-moment variations matter. Combined with faster autofocus, the Fuji enables photographers to “paint with light” on moving subjects much more effectively.
The XZ-10’s slower burst performance limits its utility in fast action but is still sufficient for general photography and casual snapshots.
Video Features: Versatility for Motion Shooters
While video isn’t the primary strength of either model, both provide practical recording options for basic videography.
- Fujifilm X30 records 1080p video at up to 60 fps, using H.264 codec, with an external microphone port for better audio - a plus for serious hobbyists.
- Olympus XZ-10 records 1080p at 30 fps max, also H.264/MPEG-4, but lacks an external mic port.
Neither supports 4K or advanced video features like log profiles or focus peaking, keeping video quality serviceable but not industry-leading.
Image stabilization is optical on Fuji (lens-based) vs sensor-shift on Olympus, both effective in minimizing handshake, but the X30’s combination with faster autofocus can yield smoother focus pulls and clearer video capture.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations
Battery endurance and storage options matter more than one might expect for daily usability.
- Fujifilm X30: Rated for approximately 470 shots per charge with NP-95 battery.
- Olympus XZ-10: Rated for about 240 shots per charge with Li-50B battery.
Practically, the Fuji’s nearly double battery life provides more freedom on extended shoots and travel, especially when combined with EVF use, which can draw power aggressively.
Both accept single SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, supporting common storage standards.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Both cameras provide basic connectivity:
- Fujifilm X30 features built-in Wi-Fi, allowing image transfer to smartphones or tablets, and remote control via app.
- Olympus XZ-10 supports Eye-Fi card compatibility for wireless transfers but no native Wi-Fi.
While Fuji’s Wi-Fi integration is more contemporary and user-friendly, it’s still limited compared to modern cameras with Bluetooth and NFC, but better than Olympus’s lacking integrated wireless.
Weather Sealing and Durability
Neither model offers environmental sealing, waterproof, dustproof, or freezeproof protection. For outdoor professionals, this is an important limitation. Use care in challenging weather or rough handling scenarios.
Image Samples: Seeing Is Believing
After extensive side-by-side shooting in portrait, landscape, street, and macro scenarios, here are comparison shots reflecting color rendition, clarity, and noise.
Note how the X30’s images maintain richer colors and cleaner shadows with less luminance noise, while the XZ-10 may impart a slightly cooler tone and visible noise at ISO 800+. The Fuji tightens up detail better in subtle textures, such as skin and foliage. However, the Olympus’s punchy contrast and saturation appeal in different artistic contexts.
Overall Performance Ratings: A Quantified Summary
For those who enjoy data-backed verdicts, here is a consolidated performance assessment blending autofocus, image quality, handling, and value.
Fuji X30 stands out for its balanced performance across most axes, whereas Olympus XZ-10 excels in portability and low light lens speed but trails in autofocus and ergonomics.
Strength in Specific Genres: Who Excels Where?
Different photography styles reveal individual strengths, and this chart compares how the models fare across disciplines.
- Portraits: X30 wins due to better color, focus tracking, and bokeh control.
- Landscape: Fuji’s dynamic range and resolution edges ahead, aided by the tilting screen for composition.
- Wildlife & Sports: The X30’s higher fps burst and reliable AF tracking dominate.
- Street Photography: Olympus’s lightweight body wins in discretion, but Fuji benefits active shooters needing quick reaction controls.
- Macro: Close focusing on both, with slight advantage on sharpness to Fuji.
- Night / Astro: X30’s sensor excels at higher ISO.
- Video: Fuji’s higher framerate and external mic support.
- Travel: Olympus edges on size, but Fuji’s battery life helps for longer excursions.
- Professional Work: Neither is a heavy hitter given sensor size, but Fuji’s control and file flexibility give it a marginal edge.
Final Recommendations: Which Compact Should You Pick?
After this granular assessment, your choice boils down to what matters most in your photography lifestyle:
Choose the Fujifilm X30 if:
- You want a tactile, control-heavy compact that feels like a serious camera in hand.
- Your emphasis is on image quality and color accuracy with better low-light performance.
- You need faster and more reliable autofocus for action or street shooting.
- You value a built-in viewfinder and tilting screen for versatile shooting angles.
- Extended battery life is important for longer sessions without charging.
- You want basic but respectable video features including mic input.
Choose the Olympus Stylus XZ-10 if:
- Maximum portability, lightweight design, and pocketability are non-negotiable.
- You appreciate a faster wide-aperture lens (f/1.8) for creative depth of field effects and low light at the wide end.
- Touchscreen control helps you navigate menus and focus with ease.
- Your shooting style is more casual or travel focused, with less need for rapid burst or complex AF.
- You’re budget-sensitive but still want decent image quality and stabilization.
Closing Thoughts
Both the Fujifilm X30 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10 highlight the art of balancing size with performance in the small sensor compact class. Fuji’s X30 clearly leans toward enthusiasts seeking a controllable camera with high-quality output and operational seriousness, whereas Olympus’s XZ-10 targets casual shooters or travelers who prize convenience over complex control.
The question “which is better?” ultimately depends on your personal shooting requirements and the trade-offs you’re willing to make. A decade of camera testing shows that thoughtful photographers always weigh ergonomics, sensor capabilities, and autofocus nuance together rather than chasing just specs.
In my experience touching thousands of cameras over 15 years, the Fuji X30 remains a robust performer that punches above its weight class in image quality and photographic control, earning it a recommendation for those serious about small sensor compacts. The Olympus XZ-10 excels as a lightweight companion camera that empowers casual creativity without hassle.
Whichever path you take, I hope this in-depth comparison brings you closer to making an informed choice for your photographic journey.
Note: Prices and availability are subject to change; both models are now discontinued but available on secondary markets and certain retail outlets.
Thanks for joining me in this detailed exploration. As always, happy shooting - and may your images be sharp and your moments fleetingly perfect.
Fujifilm X30 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Fujifilm X30 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X30 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-08-26 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.65x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, commander, suppressed flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 423 grams (0.93 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 72 x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-95 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $499 | $428 |