Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1
80 Imaging
38 Features
73 Overall
52
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 423g - 119 x 72 x 60mm
- Announced August 2014
- Replaced the Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm X30 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X30 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm X30 (2/3") and WG-M1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X30 was manufactured at a similar time to the WG-M1 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X30 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X30 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X30 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X30 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm X30 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+805k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm X30
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm X30 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X30 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm X30 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2014 |  | September 2014 | Similar age |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X30 offers outer dimensions of 119mm x 72mm x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 423 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X30 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X30 and the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X30 and WG-M1 is 80 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X30 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X30 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh WG-M1 will give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X30 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm X30 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm X30 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2014-08-26 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.65x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, commander, suppressed flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 423 grams (0.93 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 72 x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-95 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $499 | $2,000 |