Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800
80 Imaging
39 Features
73 Overall
52
![Fujifilm X30 front Fujifilm X30 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X30/Fujifilm-X30-front.jpg)
![Samsung MV800 front Samsung MV800 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-MV800.jpg)
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 423g - 119 x 72 x 60mm
- Revealed August 2014
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Released September 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm X30 versus Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X30 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X30 (2/3") and MV800 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X30 was announced 3 years later than the MV800 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X30 scores vs the MV800 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X30 & Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X30 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X30 over the Samsung MV800
Fujifilm X30 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Fujifilm X30
MV800 | Fujifilm X30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X30 and Samsung MV800
Fujifilm X30 | MV800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X30 offers exterior measurements of 119mm x 72mm x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") with a weight of 423 grams (0.93 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X30 versus Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X30 vs the MV800.
![Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X30-vs-Samsung-MV800-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X30 and MV800 is 80 and 97 respectively.
![Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X30-vs-Samsung-MV800-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X30 and MV800.
Plainly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X30 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung MV800 will show extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X30 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X30-vs-Samsung-MV800-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X30-vs-Samsung-MV800-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
Fujifilm X30 | Samsung MV800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm X30 | Samsung MV800 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-08-26 | 2011-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CCD |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.65x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, commander, suppressed flash | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 423g (0.93 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 119 x 72 x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-95 | BP70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $499 |