Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F
80 Imaging
39 Features
73 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bf43/3bf43f34b15acdde42d57aea95b411560e60171c" alt="Fujifilm X30 front Fujifilm X30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 423g - 119 x 72 x 60mm
- Launched August 2014
- Superseded the Fujifilm X20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Fujifilm X30 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X30 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X30 (2/3") and WB350F (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Fujifilm X30 was manufactured 8 months later than the WB350F and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm X30 grades against the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X30 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X30 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X30 over the Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm X30 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2014 | More recent by 8 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm X30
WB350F | Fujifilm X30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X30 and Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm X30 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X30 offers outside measurements of 119mm x 72mm x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") having a weight of 423 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X30 versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X30 compared to the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d901/3d901d377d6fe07f731216442b5abc91339da5b7" alt="Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X30 and WB350F is 80 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/998d2/998d20d73fc6b25e563538c39ce28aae1568d15e" alt="Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X30 and WB350F.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X30 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB350F will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X30 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/576e1/576e10517b73dcdcf23c1e4e85749d5438328c6b" alt="Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fffa4/fffa467ebbc66319d527c262930e4338de2bfe57" alt="Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Fujifilm X30 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm X30 | Samsung WB350F |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-08-26 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.65x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, commander, suppressed flash | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/50p/30p/25/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 423g (0.93 pounds) | 276g (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 72 x 60mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 2.4") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-95 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $260 |