Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135
90 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2012
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the C135 (14MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and C135 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm XF1 was launched 9 months later than the C135 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm XF1 matches up vs the C135 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak EasyShare C135. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery and Kodak C135 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Kodak C135
| Fujifilm XF1 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+348k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Fujifilm XF1
| C135 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak C135
| Fujifilm XF1 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm XF1 provides physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Kodak C135 has specifications of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 and the C135.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm XF1 and C135 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XF1 and C135.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Kodak C135 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm XF1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak C135 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Kodak EasyShare C135 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Kodak EasyShare C135 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1250 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 112 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 175g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $0 |