Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915
90 Imaging
37 Features
46 Overall
40
91 Imaging
32 Features
18 Overall
26
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Released January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XF1 (12MP) and the Z915 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm XF1 (2/3") and Z915 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm XF1 was launched 3 years later than the Z915 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm XF1 scores vs the Z915 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm XF1 & Kodak EasyShare Z915. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm XF1 Gallery & Kodak Z915 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XF1 over the Kodak Z915
| Fujifilm XF1 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 | January 2009 | More recent by 45 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Fujifilm XF1
| Z915 | Fujifilm XF1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XF1 and Kodak Z915
| Fujifilm XF1 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 comes with outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z915 has proportions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XF1 against the Z915.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XF1 and Z915 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The visual here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm XF1 and Z915.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm XF1 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm XF1 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm XF1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm XF1 vs Kodak Z915 Specifications
| Fujifilm XF1 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm XF1 | Kodak EasyShare Z915 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1250s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 199 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $380 | $200 |